pixel Skip to Main Content
Dr. Chris Thompson

Part IV · Reengineering metabolism

How ESG works

Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty reshapes the stomach from the inside with sutures, without abdominal incisions and without removing any stomach tissue. It reduces capacity and slows the rate at which the stomach empties.

The short answer

ESG uses sutures placed from inside the stomach to fold it into a smaller shape, with no abdominal incisions. Pooled across studies, it produces about 16.5% total body weight loss at a year, with severe adverse events around 2.2%. It works by reducing capacity and slowing emptying, and it does not lower ghrelin.

Dr. Thompson performed the world's first cases with the current technology in 2012. What follows includes the figures that favor the procedure and the ones that do not.

What ESG is

Before After sutures, which stay After the procedure Holds less capacity is reduced Empties more slowly about 152 minutes to half-empty, against 89
The two measured effects. Fasting ghrelin was higher after the procedure, not lower; ESG does not work by lowering the hunger hormone.

A suturing device is passed through the mouth. Working from inside the stomach, it places full-thickness sutures that fold the stomach wall in on itself and narrow the stomach into a tube. Nothing is cut out, and nothing is implanted.

152 vs 89 min

Time for the stomach to half-empty afterward, versus controls, a difference still present at 12 months C-IV-05

Higher

Fasting ghrelin 18 months after the procedure, not lower

That delay is the mechanism, and it is not the one most people assume. The intuitive account is that making the stomach smaller turns down the hunger hormone produced there. Measured directly, fasting ghrelin was higher eighteen months afterward, and a separate study found no change at all.C-IV-05 ESG works through capacity and timing, which is also how the FDA's own device classification describes it; it is not a ghrelin-lowering operation.

A therapy that does target ghrelin directly exists, and it is a different one: gastric mucosal ablation, which remains investigational.C-IV-06 Everself does not offer it.

What the evidence shows

16.5 %

Total body weight loss at 12 months, pooled across studies C-IV-02

~17 %

At 18–24 months

9.47 % vs 3.91%

The only sham-controlled trial: 40 MASH patients, 72 weeks C-IV-03

The pooled figure comes from a meta-analysis of 1,772 patients that Dr. Thompson co-authored. Three points about how that number is presented elsewhere deserve attention.

Importantly, these figures are total body weight loss, not excess weight loss. ESG is often described in terms of excess weight loss instead, which expresses the same result against a different denominator and makes it sound roughly three times larger.C-IV-02

The pivotal trial was open-label with no sham arm, industry-funded, and reported 13.6%.C-IV-02 The only sham-controlled trial found a smaller effect, in 40 patients with MASH liver disease followed over 72 weeks, with weight as a secondary outcome: 9.47% against 3.91%, with wide variation.C-IV-03 That gap suggests that some of the larger figure reflects knowing one has had the procedure, and the population studied is not the general one.

Safety

Pooled severe adverse events run at about 2.2%C-IV-12 and most commonly take the form of pain or nausea requiring hospitalization (1.1%), upper gastrointestinal bleeding (0.6%), and peri-gastric leak or fluid collection (0.5%).

These events are uncommon, but they are not trivial, and they should be weighed accordingly.

Regulatory status

ESG received FDA De Novo authorization on 12 July 2022, for people with a BMI between 30 and 50.C-IV-01 De Novo authorization is a specific pathway for devices that have no existing equivalent, which is what it means to be first, and it is not the same as the approval process a drug goes through.

References

  1. Janssen P, et al. Review article: the role of gastric motility in the control of food intake. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011. PMID 21342212
  2. Tack J, et al. Role of nitric oxide in the gastric accommodation reflex and in meal induced satiety in humans. Gut. 2002. PMID 12117883
  3. Park MI, Camilleri M. Gastric motor and sensory functions in obesity. Obes Res. 2005. PMID 15833933
  4. FDA De Novo classification DEN210045, granted 12 July 2022. Indication BMI 30-50. FDA DEN210045
  5. Hedjoudje A, Abu Dayyeh BK, Cheskin LJ, et al (incl. Thompson CC). Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020. PMID 31442601
  6. Abu Dayyeh BK, et al. MERIT trial: endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty for treatment of class 1 and 2 obesity. Lancet. 2022. PMID 35908555
  7. MASH trial: sham-controlled randomised trial of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty. 2024. PMID 39694202
  8. Lopez-Nava G, et al. Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty for Obesity: a Multicenter Study of 248 Patients with 24 Months Follow-Up. Obes Surg. 2017. PMID 28451929
  9. 21 CFR 876.5983 - classification regulation wording for the endoscopic suturing device. CFR 21 CFR 876.5983
  10. Vargas EJ, et al. Effect of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty on gastric emptying, motility and hormones: a comparative prospective study. Gut. 2023. PMID 36241388
  11. Lopez-Nava G, et al. Gut hormone changes after endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty. Obes Surg. 2020. PMID 32193741
  12. Gadi SRV, et al. Gastric fundal mucosal ablation followed by endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty in adults with obesity: a first-in-human two-phase pilot clinical trial. Endoscopy. 2026. PMID 41760139
  13. Kumbhari V, et al. Safety Framework for Gastric Mucosal Ablation (GMA) Using Hybrid Argon Plasma Coagulation (hAPC): International Expert Consensus. Obes Surg. 2026. PMID 42142234
  14. Lopez-Nava G, et al. Re-suturing after primary endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) for obesity. Surg Endosc. 2021. PMID 32583068
  15. Schwartz MW, Seeley RJ, et al. Obesity Pathogenesis: An Endocrine Society Scientific Statement. Endocr Rev. 2017. PMC5546881
  16. Speakman JR, et al. Set points, settling points and some alternative models. Dis Model Mech. 2011. PMID 22065844
Next Medication vs. procedure